Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: an interpersonal approach
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Virginia S Y Kwan1, Oliver P John, David A Kenny
1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1010, USA. vkwan@princeton.edu
Abstract:
Self-enhancement bias has been studied from 2 perspectives: L. Festinger's (1954) social comparison theory (self-enhancers perceive themselves more positively than they perceive others) and G. W. Allport's (1937) self-insight theory (self-enhancers perceive themselves more positively than they are perceived by others). These 2 perspectives are theoretically and empirically distinct, and the failure to recognize their differences has led to a protracted debate. A new interpersonal approach to self-enhancement decomposes self-perception into 3 components: perceiver effect, target effect, and unique self-perception. Both theoretical derivations and an illustrative study suggest that this resulting measure of self-enhancement is less confounded by unwanted components of interpersonal perception than previous social comparison and self-insight measures. Findings help reconcile conflicting views about whether self-enhancement is adaptive or maladaptive.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Serving Bias
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
