Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variation among developmental dyslexics: evidence from a printed-word-learning task.

Caroline E Bailey1, Franklin R Manis, William C Pedersen

  • 1Psychology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|February 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of rotational profile and foot loading in the uninvolved leg of children with unilateral clubfoot treated with foot abduction orthoses.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B·2026
Same author

Surgical Strategies for Cleft Foot Deformity in a Pediatric Population.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics·2026
Same author

How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities.

Journal of educational psychology·2022
Same author

What Might Books Be Teaching Young Children About Gender?

Psychological science·2021
Same author

Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills.

Journal of memory and language·2020
Same author

Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia.

Neuropsychologia·2020
Same journal

Executive function and preschoolers' responses to severe transgressions: implications for early forgiveness.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Shared cognitive risk factors underlying rapid automatized naming deficits for the comorbidity of developmental dyslexia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A computational parameter estimation via Bundesen's theory of visual attention.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Do young children understand the objectivity of reality?

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Learning words by ear or by eye: effects of modality on lexical configuration and lexicalization.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Thinking outside the Box: Causal uncertainty motivates children's over-imitation.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Effects of parental intervention on children's English utterances and behavioral responses in video-based second language learning.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
See all related articles

Phonological dyslexics show specific phonological deficits, while surface dyslexics struggle with arbitrary word pronunciations. Both groups exhibit slower word learning than typical readers.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental psychology

Background:

  • Developmental dyslexia is a heterogeneous condition.
  • Distinguishing subtypes like phonological and surface dyslexia is crucial for understanding reading deficits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct word-learning profiles of phonological and surface dyslexics.
  • To compare the performance of dyslexic subtypes with age and reading level-matched normal readers.

Main Methods:

  • A word-learning task involving novel regular and irregular words.
  • Assessment of learning speed and pronunciation accuracy in dyslexic and control groups.

Main Results:

  • Phonological dyslexics learned words slower than controls and lacked a regular-word advantage.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Surface dyslexics showed slower learning and difficulties with arbitrary pronunciations, resembling younger readers.
  • Results support distinct deficit profiles for phonological and surface dyslexia.

    • Conclusions:

    • Phonological and surface dyslexia represent different patterns of reading impairment.
    • Models of reading disability must account for this heterogeneity.
    • Understanding subtype-specific deficits can inform targeted interventions.