Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A faculty research and training program for undergraduates in the sciences.

W C Randall1, S L Burden

  • 1Department of Biology, Taylor University, Upland, Indiana 46989.

The American Journal of Physiology
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The quantitation of cutaneous vascular reactions with the photoelectric plethysmograph.

Federation proceedings·2010
Same author

Sweat glands in the rat and their response to prolonged nervous stimulation.

The Anatomical record·2010
Same author

Sweat gland activity and changing patterns of sweat secretion on the skin surface.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same author

The estimation of the cutaneous blood flow with the photoelectric plethysmograph.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same author

Enumeration of functional sweat glands in the human.

Federation proceedings·2010
Same author

Arterial pressure gradients, arterial oscillometry and cutaneous blood flow in the analysis of arterial obstruction.

Federation proceedings·2010
Same journal

Blood coagulation in fish.

The American journal of physiology·2011
Same journal

Renal tubular reabsorption, metabolic utilization and isomeric fractionation of lactic acid in the dog.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

The inactivation of placental toxin by human serum.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Adrenal function following ovariectomy in the rat.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Capillary permeability; perfusion of frog and guinea pig hind limbs.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Evaluation of protective measures against sunburn.

The American journal of physiology·2010
See all related articles

Faculty involvement in hands-on research is crucial for sparking student interest in science. Restoring this connection is key to U.S. scientific leadership and revitalizing undergraduate science education.

Area of Science:

  • Science Education
  • Higher Education Pedagogy
  • Mentorship in STEM

Background:

  • Faculty enthusiasm and hands-on involvement are vital for student research interest.
  • The shift towards "big science" has reduced direct faculty-student contact and funding for undergraduate research.
  • Overburdened faculty struggle to balance research demands with heavy teaching loads, leading to burnout.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical role of faculty mentorship in fostering student engagement with science.
  • To highlight the detrimental effects of reduced faculty research involvement on undergraduate science education.
  • To advocate for the restoration of faculty opportunities and support for research.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of the impact of faculty role models on scientific career choices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the challenges faced by contemporary university faculty in maintaining research engagement.
  • Conceptual framework for revitalizing undergraduate science research environments.

    • Main Results:

    • Faculty hands-on involvement is a primary driver of student interest and excitement in science.
    • Decline in faculty research engagement leads to languishing research in undergraduate institutions.
    • Lack of faculty role models hinders students' ability to experience the impact of scientific commitment.

    Conclusions:

    • Restoring faculty's opportunity and aspiration for personal research involvement is essential.
    • Providing dedicated time, facilities, incentives, and encouragement is necessary for faculty research.
    • Re-energizing faculty research is key to inspiring students and restoring U.S. science and technology leadership.