Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of four corneal pachymetry technique;s in corneal refractive surgery
Jaime Javaloy1, Maria Teresa Vidal, Jose R Villada
1Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. jjavaloy@coma.es
Purpose:
To assess the effectiveness of optical and ultrasonic pachymetry when examining corneas of patients before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
Methods:
We conducted a prospective study of 25 patients (50 eyes) who had LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism (mean spherical equivalent refraction -4.80 +/- 3.60 D; range -1.75 to -12.00 D). Corneal thickness was measured using 1) conventional ultrasonic pachymetry (20 MHz probe) in the central cornea, 2) ASL confocal microscopy (CMTF analysis), 3) Orbscan II Analyzer, and 4) ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) (50 MHz probe) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.
Results:
Preoperative pachymetry values measured with the Orbscan II Analyzer (551.3 +/- 27.3 microm) were almost identical to those measured with the 20 MHz ultrasonic probe (553.7 +/- 25.7 microm; t-test P = .652). The mean preoperative pachymetry for UBM was 566.7 +/- 38.8 microm and for CMTF was 553.2 +/- 15.5 microm. The optic and ultrasonic system measurements differed in operated eyes; 20 MHz ultrasonic pachymetry yielded an average 478.7 +/- 23.5 microm and the UBM, 482.4 +/- 40.3 microm. These measurements differed from the Orbscan II (Tukey test; P = .023) measurement of 461.1 +/- 37.5 microm but not from the confocal microscopy measurement of 475.2 +/- 41.8 microm. UBM registered greater values that were more variable than those obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry.
Conclusions:
In non-operated eyes, corneal thickness was similar using conventional ultrasound, Orbscan II, or confocal techniques, with ultrasound biomicroscopy giving thicker readings.