M-wave analysis and passive tilt in patients with different degrees of carotid artery disease

C Haubrich1, A Klemm, R R Diehl

  • 1Departments of Neurology Neuroradiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany. christina.haubrich@t-online.de

Insights

Cross-spectral analysis (CSA) of Mayer-wave (M-wave) oscillations is superior to passive tilting for assessing cerebral autoregulation in carotid artery disease (CAD). Autoregulation capacity depends on CAD severity, collateralization, and prior strokes.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vascular Medicine
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Carotid artery disease (CAD) significantly impairs cerebral autoregulation, increasing stroke risk.
  • Therapeutic strategies for CAD depend on disease severity, necessitating accurate assessment of autoregulatory capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between the degree of carotid artery disease and cerebral autoregulatory capacity.
  • To compare the efficacy of cross-spectral analysis (CSA) and passive tilting (PT) in assessing cerebral autoregulation.

Main Methods:

  • Cerebral autoregulation was assessed in 102 patients with severe carotid stenosis or occlusion and 14 controls.
  • Methods included continuous transcranial Doppler sonography, beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure monitoring during passive tilting, and CSA of M-wave oscillations.

Main Results:

  • Passive tilting showed lower sensitivity and specificity for assessing autoregulation compared to CSA.
  • CSA revealed gradually lowered phase angles with increasing carotid stenosis, moderately correlated with CAD severity (r = -0.35).
  • Collateralization sufficiency and prior strokes influenced autoregulatory capacity.

Conclusions:

  • Cross-spectral analysis of M-waves is a more appropriate method for testing cerebral autoregulation than passive tilting.
  • Cerebral autoregulation capacity is influenced by the degree of carotid artery disease, collateral pathways, and pre-existing strokes.
Abstract