Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Habitat destruction in mutualistic metacommunities.

Sona Prakash1, André M de Roos

  • 1Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 320, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands. prakash@science.uva.nl

Theoretical Population Biology
|February 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The allometry of vertebrate pursuit predation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Pathogens stabilize or destabilize depending on host stage structure.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2023
Same author

Marine reserves promote cycles in fish populations on ecological and evolutionary time scales.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

An immune memory-structured SIS epidemiological model for hyperdiverse pathogens.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Using individual-based bioenergetic models to predict the aggregate effects of disturbance on populations: A case study with beaked whales and Navy sonar.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Correction to: Resonance in Physiologically Structured Population Models.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2021
Same journal

Statistical test to compare the linkage model and the admixture model based on central limit results.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Threshold dynamics in age-structured distributions with expanding support: A unified mathematical framework.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic-statistical model for the expansion of ash dieback.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Dynamics of an intraguild predation system with optimal foraging and harvesting.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Impact of co-occurrent assortative mating and vertical cultural transmission on measures of genetic associations.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

The coalescent of a sample from a linear-fractional branching process.

Theoretical population biology·2026
See all related articles

Strong mutualism allows species to persist in low-habitat conditions. Restricted dispersal benefits species with mutualistic interactions, especially in adverse environments.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Metacommunity Dynamics
  • Mutualistic Interactions

Background:

  • Mutualism can enhance species persistence by reducing extinction or increasing colonization.
  • Habitat availability is a critical factor for metacommunity survival.
  • Spatial structure and dispersal patterns influence community dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how mutualistic interactions affect species persistence in a metacommunity.
  • To compare the effects of colonization-enhancing versus extinction-reducing mutualism.
  • To analyze the impact of restricted versus unrestricted dispersal on metacommunity stability.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling a mutualistic metacommunity with varying interaction strengths.
  • Comparing spatially implicit (mean field) and spatially explicit models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing persistence thresholds under different dispersal scenarios (global vs. local).

    • Main Results:

    • Strong mutualism enables species persistence at lower habitat densities than in its absence.
    • Colonization-enhancing mutualism allows persistence at lower habitat densities than extinction-reducing mutualism.
    • Restricted dispersal can be more beneficial than unrestricted dispersal for mutualistic species, especially in adverse conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Mutualistic interactions are crucial for metacommunity resilience, particularly under low habitat availability.
    • The spatial structure of dispersal significantly impacts metacommunity stability, with local dispersal sometimes offering an advantage.
    • The benefits of mutualism and restricted dispersal are amplified with an increasing number of species in the metacommunity.