Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Darwin, deception, and facial expression.

Paul Ekman1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|February 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The rise of affectivism.

Nature human behaviour·2021
Same author

What Scientists Who Study Emotion Agree About.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2016
Same author

Inside the Psychologist's Studio.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2015
Same author

Emotional vocalizations are recognized across cultures regardless of the valence of distractors.

Psychological science·2015
Same author

Anticipatory sensitization to repeated stressors: the role of initial cortisol reactivity and meditation/emotion skills training.

Psychoneuroendocrinology·2014
Same author

Life in science. Respect in a pinch.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2012
Same journal

Multiomics Profiling During Autoimmune Demyelination Highlights a Complex Regulatory Role for Ataxin-1 in B Cells.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Global Trends in Light Pollution and Their Relationship With Socioeconomic Factors.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Wired for Corruption: Inter-Brain Synchrony Encodes Bribery-Related Value Information and Predicts Bribery Agreement.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

LM-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Enhanced Model for Forest Smoke Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

DARTS-CNN-BiLSTM: Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tool Feed System.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
See all related articles

Charles Darwin explored deception, questioning if fabricated emotional expressions are detectable. Research suggests that facial actions difficult to fake may reveal deception, unlike body movements.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Nonverbal Communication

Background:

  • Charles Darwin's seminal work briefly touched upon deception and emotional expression.
  • He posed questions regarding the voluntary control and fabrication of emotional displays.
  • Darwin suggested potential methods for detecting deception based on facial actions and body movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing research related to Darwin's hypotheses on deception and emotional expression.
  • To explore contemporary research on deception not foreseen by Darwin.
  • To synthesize findings on the detectability of fabricated emotional expressions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on deception and emotional expression.
  • Analysis of research addressing Darwin's specific suggestions on fabricating expressions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of modern deception detection research.

    • Main Results:

    • Research supports Darwin's idea that expressions difficult to voluntarily generate are key indicators.
    • The absence of genuine, hard-to-fake facial actions can indeed unmask deception.
    • Body movements may be more easily suppressed during deception than facial expressions.

    Conclusions:

    • Darwin's early insights into deception detection remain relevant.
    • Detecting deception can be approached by analyzing the presence or absence of specific facial actions.
    • Further research continues to expand on the complexities of human deception.