Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Key concepts in health care priority setting.

Rogeer Hoedemaekers1, Wim Dekkers

  • 1Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. R.Hoedemaekers@efg.umcn.nl

Health Care Analysis : HCA : Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy
|February 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Viewing a person through the body: the relevance of philosophical anthropology to medical education.

Korean journal of medical education·2015
Same author

Bodily integrity and male circumcision: an islamic perspective.

The Journal of IMA·2013
Same author

Dwelling, house and home: towards a home-led perspective on dementia care.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2011
Same author

On the notion of home and the goals of palliative care.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2009
Same author

Conceptual analysis and empirical research in medical philosophy and medical ethics.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2009
Same author

Unbearable suffering of patients with a request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: an integrative review.

Psycho-oncology·2009

Implicit interpretations of health concepts influence health care benefit package decisions. Explicitly discussing these notions in priority-setting procedures ensures more consistent health care choices.

Area of Science:

  • Health policy
  • Medical ethics
  • Health economics

Background:

  • Benefit package decisions often rely on implicit interpretations of core health concepts.
  • Varied understandings of health, disease, and necessary care can lead to inconsistent inclusion or exclusion of services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the implicit value judgments in defining key health care notions.
  • To propose a framework for explicit discussion of these concepts in priority setting.
  • To improve consistency in health care benefit package decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of terms like health, health risk, disease, and quality of life.
  • Examination of value judgments embedded in these definitions.
  • Discussion of decision-making body composition and procedural phases.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Implicit definitions of health concepts significantly impact benefit package composition.
  • Explicitly addressing these definitions in decision-making processes is crucial.
  • Structured discussion of key notions can lead to more coherent priority setting.

Conclusions:

  • Explicitly defining and discussing core health concepts is essential for equitable health care benefit packages.
  • Decision-making bodies must address the varied interpretations of health notions.
  • Consistent priority-setting procedures require explicit deliberation on the meaning of health care terms.