Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimally invasive vein surgery.

Steven M Elias1, Krista L Frasier

  • 1Center for Vein Disease, Division of Vascular Surgery, Engelwood Hospital and Medical Center, NJ, USA.

The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York
|February 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Minimally invasive vein surgery (MIVS) advances reduce complications and recovery time. These techniques offer results comparable to traditional open procedures for lower extremity venous issues.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gender discrimination may be worse than you think: testing ordinal interactions in power research.

The Journal of general psychology·2006
Same author

Effects of winning the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show on breed popularity.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2004
Same author

Minimally invasive vein surgery: its role in the treatment of venous stasis ulceration.

American journal of surgery·2004
Same author

Powered phlebectomy (TriVex) in treatment of varicose veins.

Annals of vascular surgery·2002

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Phlebology

Background:

  • The last decade has seen significant advancements in minimally invasive vein surgery (MIVS).
  • These innovations aim to improve patient outcomes by reducing surgical invasiveness.
  • Traditional open procedures for venous disorders often involve longer recovery periods and higher morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and discuss key minimally invasive vein surgery techniques.
  • To highlight the benefits of MIVS in managing lower extremity venous pathophysiology.
  • To compare the efficacy of MIVS with conventional open surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of Transilluminated Powered Phlebectomy (TIPP) TriVex.
  • Review of Radiofrequency Ablation Greater Saphenous Vein (RFGSV) Closure.
  • Analysis of Laser Ablation Greater Saphenous Vein (EVLT).
  • Examination of Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery (SEPS).
  • Overview of Percutaneous Vein Valve Bioprosthesis (PVVB).

Main Results:

  • MIVS techniques have demonstrably decreased operative morbidity.
  • Reduced number and size of incisions, operative time, and recovery time are key benefits.
  • MIVS effectively manages venous pathophysiology across all three venous systems of the lower extremities.

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive vein surgery offers a less invasive approach to treating venous disorders.
  • The outcomes achieved with MIVS are comparable to those of open surgical procedures.
  • MIVS represents a significant improvement in patient care for venous diseases.

Related Experiment Videos