Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cochlear implants for congenital deformities.

P D Phelps1

  • 1Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London.

The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maxillary sinus mucocele presenting as a late complication of a maxillary advancement procedure.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2003
Same author

Neuro-otological findings in Pendred syndrome.

International journal of audiology·2003
Same author

Cochlear implants in children with craniofacial syndromes: assessment and outcomes.

International journal of audiology·2002
Same author

Hyrtl's fissure.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2002
Same author

Minimising radiation dose to the lens in axial computed tomography of the temporal.

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2000
Same author

Congenital malformations of the ear and cochlear implantation in children: review and temporal bone report of common cavity.

The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2000
Same journal

Audiological Outcomes in 465 Primary Myringoplasties: Reporting Pitfalls and Lessons Learned.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Design and technical validation of a low-cost, titanium sheet metal TORP (SM-T) for manufacturing and use in LMICs- ERRATUM.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-term Recurrence of Cholesteatoma Following Primary Surgery: An Umbrella Review of Surgical Techniques and Patient Factors.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Tinnitus burden in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media undergoing surgery in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Microbiological findings in persistent otologic infections in a community otolaryngology clinic: a retrospective case series.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Septal melanoma: does surgical excision confer a potential survival benefit? A single centre's experience and literature review.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
See all related articles

Multi-channel cochlear implants are suitable for some congenital inner ear deformities like Mondini, but not for primitive otocysts or severe labyrinthine dysplasia. Careful CT assessment guides implant suitability for profound hearing loss.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Congenital inner ear malformations can cause severe, progressive deafness.
  • High-resolution CT scans are crucial for pre-implantation assessment of these deformities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify which congenital inner ear malformations are suitable for multi-channel cochlear implantation.
  • To determine contraindications for cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear deformities.

Main Methods:

  • Review of cases with congenital inner ear malformations.
  • Analysis of high-resolution CT findings.
  • Correlation of malformation types with cochlear implant outcomes.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • True Mondini deformity with a dilated vestibular aqueduct is suitable for multi-channel cochlear implants.
  • Primitive otocyst, severe labyrinthine dysplasia, and X-linked deformities are contraindications.

    • Conclusions:

    • CT imaging is essential for evaluating cochlear implant candidacy in patients with congenital inner ear malformations.
    • Specific malformations dictate the suitability and contraindications for multi-channel cochlear implantation.