Prediction of nuclear maturity from cumulus-coronal morphology: influence of embryologist experience

A majority of in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs continues to evaluate oocyte maturity on the basis of cumulus-coronal morphology (CCM) even though marked asynchrony has been reported between CCM and nuclear maturity. This study was designed to examine changes in embryologists' ability to correctly predict nuclear maturity from CCM as a function of increasing experience. Nuclear maturity was assessed by inverted microscopy with a modified spreading technique at follicular aspiration. A second objective was to determine the percentage of oocytes which displayed asynchrony between CCM and nuclear maturity as assessed by embryologists with extensive experience in oocyte maturity evaluation.

The three participating embryologists had directly evaluated 1304, 75, and 0 oocytes for nuclear maturity and CCM at study initiation and correctly predicted nuclear maturity from CCM in 74, 64, and 47% of oocytes, respectively. Embryologist 1 did not significantly change in predictive ability during the 17-month study period. Embryologist 2 significantly improved in predictive ability during the first 9 months of the study (841 oocytes evaluated) and plateaued thereafter, at a similar percentage of correct predictions as embryologist 1. Embryologist 3 continued to improve in predictive ability throughout the study period, reaching 61% correct predictions at the close of the study after evaluating 223 oocytes. Once embryologists had plateaued in their predictive ability, 72% of oocytes evaluated received the correct nuclear maturity classification based on CCM. Significantly fewer oocytes (54%; 375/690) evaluated by embryologists who had not plateaued in their predictive ability received the correct nuclear maturity classification based on CCM.

These results indicate that embryologists' ability to predict oocyte nuclear maturity correctly from CCM continues to change over several months even when pretraining video recordings are used before beginning direct evaluations. After embryologists plateaued in their predictive ability, nuclear maturity still could not be correctly predicted from CCM in 28% of oocytes due to asynchrony between nuclear and CCM maturity. Based upon this, circumstances in which the spreading technique should be used for direct assessment of nuclear maturity as opposed to assessment of CCM only are discussed.