Related Experiment Videos
Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability
G A Zielhuis1, M E Hulscher, E I Florack
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
International Journal of Epidemiology
|December 1, 1992
Summary
This study validated a fertility problems questionnaire for women. Personal interviews showed fewer random errors, while telephone and mail methods offered good reliability for fertility research.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Health
- Epidemiology
- Survey Methodology
Background:
- Assessing fertility problems requires reliable and valid questionnaires.
- Previous research has not fully evaluated the validity and reliability of short fertility questionnaires across different administration methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity and reliability of a novel short questionnaire designed to assess fertility problems.
- To compare the effectiveness of personal interviews, telephone interviews, and mailed questionnaires in data collection for fertility research.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 151 moderately educated women with prior early pregnancy failure.
- Validity was assessed using personal interviews, telephone interviews, and mail questionnaires.
- Reliability was tested on 89 women with at least one child, administering the questionnaire twice over 3-5 weeks.
Main Results:
- No systematic errors were detected across all administration methods during the validity study.
- Personal interviews exhibited the lowest levels of random error.
- Telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires demonstrated high stability, indicating good reliability.
Conclusions:
- The fertility problems questionnaire demonstrates reasonable performance but requires rephrasing for certain items.
- The optimal method for approaching study populations (personal, telephone, mail) depends on the specific research question and desired data quality.
- Further refinement of the questionnaire items is recommended for improved accuracy in fertility problem assessment.