Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2026

An In Vivo Duo-color Method for Imaging Vascular Dynamics Following Contusive Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: December 31, 2017
MR angiography of the spine and spinal cord
Pradip M Pattany1, Efrat Saraf-Lavi, Brian C Bowen
1Department of Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.
Objectives:
This review has three objectives: 1) to describe spinal vascular anatomy, focusing on thoracolumbar intradural vessels detectable by both magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction x-ray angiography (DSA), 2) to compare the MRA techniques that have been used to detect the major intradural vessels, and 3) to illustrate the clinical application of these MRA techniques, especially their efficacy in characterizing spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (AVF).
Methods:
MRA is an adjunct to conventional magnetic resonance imaging. MRA is usually implemented as a three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced (CE) gradient-echo technique, with two approaches to data acquisition: 1) "standard" 3D CE MRA, requiring approximately 10 minutes per 3D volume, and 2) "fast" (bolus/dynamic) 3D CE MRA, requiring approximately 0.5 to 2 minutes per 3D volume depending on k-space sampling schemes. Vessels are displayed on targeted maximum intensity projection images.
Results:
Normal intradural vessels detected on standard CE MRA are primarily veins (medullary and median), whereas both arteries and veins are detected on fast CE MRA. Identification of arteries (artery of Adamkiewicz, anterior spinal artery) is limited, and their differentiation from veins can be incomplete. Intradural vessels in patients with dural fistulae have abnormal features on MRI (length of flow voids and postcontrast serpentine enhancement) and standard 3D CE MRA (length, tortuosity, and qualitative size of dominant perimedullary vessel), which differ significantly from those of normal vessels. Standard MRA added to a conventional MRI study significantly (P=0.016) increased the rate of detection of the spinal level of a dural fistula. The correct level +/- one vertebral segment was identified in 73% of true-positive patients.
Conclusions:
Application of spinal MRA requires knowledge of vascular anatomy, specifically the major intradural vessels, and careful implementation of 3D CE MRA techniques. The standard technique allows for more effective noninvasive screening for vascular lesions, particularly dural AVF, than magnetic resonance imaging alone. Preliminary results indicate that the fast technique may further improve characterization of normal and abnormal intradural vessels, especially if continued technical advances yield greater temporal resolution while maintaining adequate spatial resolution.
Related Concept Videos
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
The Spinal Cord
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

