Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Haptic dominance in form perception: vision versus proprioception.

M A Heller1

  • 1Winston-Salem State University, NC 27110.

Perception
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Haptic perception of the horizontal by blind and low-vision individuals.

Perception·2001
Same author

Society, science, and values.

Perception·2000
Same author

Arthroscopic decompression for impingement syndrome secondary to an unstable os acromiale.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2000
Same author

Perception of the horizontal and vertical in tangible displays: minimal gender differences.

Perception·2000
Same author

Intersensory conflict between vision and touch: the response modality dominates when precise, attention-riveting judgments are required.

Perception & psychophysics·1999
Same author

Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·1998

This study explored how vision and touch interact when they conflict. Most participants relied on touch to identify letters when visual and tactile information disagreed, suggesting touch dominance.

Area of Science:

  • * Cognitive Psychology
  • * Neuroscience
  • * Sensory Perception

Background:

  • * Understanding intersensory integration is crucial for explaining how the brain processes conflicting sensory information.
  • * Previous research has explored sensory dominance, but the specific conflict between vision and touch in letter identification requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To investigate the interplay between vision and touch when presented with conflicting sensory stimuli.
  • * To determine the dominant sense in a scenario involving mirror-induced visual-tactile discrepancies for embossed letters.
  • * To explore individual differences in sensory reliance and their impact on perception.

Main Methods:

  • * Participants identified embossed tangible letters (p, q, b, d, W, M) while viewing them in a mirror.

Related Experiment Videos

  • * A mirror was used to create discrepancies in letter form and finger movement direction.
  • * Subjects reported their letter identifications, and their reliance on vision versus touch was assessed.

    • Main Results:

    • * A mirror created both vertical inversion and directional conflict between visual and tactile input.
    • * The majority of participants demonstrated a reliance on tactile information over visual information.
    • * Significant individual differences were observed, with most showing touch dominance, one visual dominance, and others a sensory compromise.

    Conclusions:

    • * Tactile perception often dominates over visual perception when faced with conflicting sensory information.
    • * Attentional mechanisms likely play a role in resolving intersensory conflicts.
    • * Individual differences in sensory processing strategies influence perceptual outcomes.