Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of stroke.

R Langton-Hewer1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, England.

Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. Supplement
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate assessment requires identifying and quantifying problems for both clinical practice and research. Effective research assessment tools must be valid, reliable, sensitive, and comprehensive to ensure meaningful results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selection of aphasic stroke patients for intensive speech therapy.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·1987
Same author

Services for stroke patients one year after stroke.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·1986
Same author

Pain in motor neuron disease.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·1985
Same author

Controlled trial of a home-care service for acute stroke patients.

Lancet (London, England)·1985
Same author

Stroke: the influence of age upon outcome.

Age and ageing·1984
Same author

Motor neurone disease: can we do better? A study of 42 patients.

British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·1984
Same journal

Short- and long-term effects of a 12-week intensive functional restoration programme in individuals work-disabled by chronic spinal pain.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement·2000
Same journal

Physiotherapy in muscular dystrophy.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement·1999
Same journal

Assessment of motor functions.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement·1999
Same journal

Congenital muscular dystrophy. Care of children and families.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement·1999
Same journal

Dystrophia myotonica. Clinical, pathophysiological and molecular aspects.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement·1999
Same journal

Mitochondrial myopathies. Clinical and diagnostic aspects.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement·1999
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Scientific methodology
  • Clinical assessment
  • Research evaluation

Background:

  • Assessment is crucial for identifying and quantifying problems in various contexts.
  • Both routine clinical practice and scientific research necessitate robust assessment strategies.
  • The quality of assessment directly impacts the reliability and validity of findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the essential characteristics of effective assessment tools.
  • To differentiate assessment requirements for clinical practice versus research.
  • To emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate assessment methods based on research questions.

Main Methods:

  • The study emphasizes the conceptual framework of assessment, focusing on identification and quantification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It highlights criteria for evaluating assessment tools, including validity, reliability, repeatability, and sensitivity.
  • The text discusses the practical application of assessment in clinical settings (e.g., checklists) and research (formal procedures).

    • Main Results:

    • Assessment involves a two-step process: problem identification and quantification.
    • Research-specific assessment tools must be valid, reliable, repeatable, and sensitive.
    • Comprehensiveness is a key attribute, ensuring no essential elements are overlooked.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective assessment is fundamental for both clinical practice and scientific inquiry.
    • The selection of assessment tools must be tailored to the specific research question.
    • Formal, rigorous assessment procedures are indispensable for research validity.