Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge.

W G Jones1, R J Ginsberg

  • 1Division of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spontaneous Pneumothorax.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

Limits on the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from the first science run of the ZEPLIN-III experiment.

Physical review letters·2009
Same author

Multimodality treatment of resectable non small-cell lung cancer.

Clinical lung cancer·2004
Same author

Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer.

British journal of cancer·2004
Same author

Necrosis of nasal and airway epithelium in rats inhaling vapors of artificial butter flavoring.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2002
Same author

Morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer: the risks of right pneumonectomy.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2001
Same journal

Coronary artery bypass grafting based on computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve versus angiography: Early results.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Beyond R0: Margin Cytology and Local Control After Sublobar Resection.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Deferred AVR During CABG in Moderate Aortic Stenosis: Lower Index Risk or Deferred Cumulative Risk?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Renaissance of Transapical TAVR: From Competing Access Route to Enabling Platform for Hybrid Heart Therapy.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

A Moving Target: Interpreting Post-TAVI Reintervention in a Rapidly Evolving Era.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

False Lumen Remodeling Versus Intraluminal Graft Thrombosis: Distinct Phenomena After Frozen Elephant Trunk Repair.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Esophageal perforation, often caused by medical procedures, presents diagnostic and treatment challenges. Early diagnosis and prompt, reinforced primary repair or selective nonoperative management improve patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Gastroenterology
  • Esophageal Diseases

Background:

  • Esophageal perforation is a significant clinical challenge with increasing incidence due to frequent endoscopic procedures.
  • Instrumentation of the esophagus is the primary cause of perforation.
  • Diagnosis requires high clinical suspicion and confirmation via imaging or endoscopy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of esophageal perforation.
  • To discuss factors influencing outcomes after esophageal perforation.
  • To outline current management strategies for esophageal perforations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on esophageal perforation.
  • Analysis of diagnostic modalities including contrast esophagography and endoscopy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of surgical and nonoperative treatment approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Outcomes are contingent on injury cause, location, underlying disease, and treatment timing.
    • Reinforced primary repair is the preferred surgical approach.
    • Nonoperative management is effective for select limited injuries with antibiotics and nutritional support.

    Conclusions:

    • Esophageal perforation necessitates prompt diagnosis and tailored treatment.
    • Surgical repair remains a primary treatment, with nonoperative options for specific cases.
    • Improved outcomes depend on timely and appropriate intervention based on injury characteristics.