Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How fast should the night shift rotate?

R T Wilkinson1

  • 1Medical Research Council, Psychophysiology Section, Cambridge, UK.

Ergonomics
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rapid rotation shift work is often claimed as optimal, but fixed-night shifts are superior for night work. Rapid rotation may be best for daytime shifts, pending further research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response-stimulus interval in choice serial reaction time: interaction with sleep deprivation, choice, and practice.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·1990
Same author

The detection of sleep onset: behavioral, physiological, and subjective convergence.

Sleep·1989
Same author

Behavioral versus EEG-based monitoring of all-night sleep/wake patterns.

Sleep·1988
Same author

Eye movements and the detection of sleep onset.

Psychophysiology·1988
Same author

The detection of sleep onset: behavioral and physiological convergence.

Psychophysiology·1984
Same author

The effects of a restricted sleep regime on the composition of sleep and on performance.

Psychophysiology·1984
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Chronobiology
  • Workforce Management

Background:

  • Rapid rotation shift systems (2-3 day intervals) are commonly asserted as the optimal method for organizing 24-hour staffing.
  • Evidence supporting these claims requires critical analysis and comparison with alternative shift scheduling strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the purported benefits of rapid rotation shift work.
  • To review evidence comparing rapid rotation with longer shift rotation periods.
  • To determine the most effective shift scheduling for 24-hour operations.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing claims regarding shift work rotation.
  • Systematic review of scientific literature comparing different shift rotation frequencies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of shift systems based on multiple criteria.

    • Main Results:

    • Permanent, fixed-night shift systems demonstrate superiority across most evaluated metrics for night work.
    • Rapid rotation may be a suitable option for managing morning and afternoon day shifts.
    • The optimal shift system is context-dependent due to the variety of work settings.

    Conclusions:

    • Fixed-night shifts are recommended for night work, with rapid rotation as a secondary option for daytime shifts.
    • Current recommendations are provisional and require further empirical data comparing different shift systems directly.
    • Further research is needed to validate the superiority of fixed-night systems and the applicability of rapid rotation for day shifts.