Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of variance components in gene expression data.

James J Chen1, Robert R Delongchamp, Chen-An Tsai

  • 1Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment, National Center for Toxicology Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA. jchen@nctr.fda.gov

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|February 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeting the Apelin-APJ Axis: A Promising Strategy to Mitigate Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity.

Cardiovascular toxicology·2026
Same author

Correction: Exploring Predictive Risk Factors for Myocardial Injury in Children Treated with Anthracyclines: A Pilot Study.

Cardiovascular toxicology·2026
Same author

Exploring Predictive Risk Factors for Myocardial Injury in Children Treated with Anthracyclines: A Pilot Study.

Cardiovascular toxicology·2025
Same author

Enabling novel paradigms: a biological questions-based approach to human chemical hazard and drug safety assessment.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2023
Same author

Applying genomics in regulatory toxicology: a report of the ECETOC workshop on omics threshold on non-adversity.

Archives of toxicology·2023
Same author

Efficient Selection of Gaussian Kernel SVM Parameters for Imbalanced Data.

Genes·2023
Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

EDEL: Enhancing Dense Retrievers for Curation of Biomedical Knowledge Bases.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

This study quantifies variation in microarray experiments. Week-to-week and animal-to-animal variations are key sources, informing experimental design for better accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Microarray experiments involve multiple steps, each introducing potential biological and technical variation.
  • Understanding and quantifying these variations is crucial for accurate experimental design and reliable results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and quantify animal-to-animal, between-array, within-array, and day-to-day variations in microarray data.
  • To apply a variance-components approach to identify major sources of variability.
  • To provide insights for optimizing microarray experimental design.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a variance-components approach to analyze two distinct microarray datasets.
  • Applied linear mixed-effects models to quantify different sources of variation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined technical variances in pooled samples and biological/technical variances in a time-course experiment.

    • Main Results:

    • For technical variation, between-array variance exceeded between-section, which exceeded within-section variance.
    • In time-course data, week-to-week variance was the largest contributor, followed by between-array and within-array variances.
    • Animal-to-animal variance was significant, though gene-specific analysis showed it smaller than between-array variance for housekeeping genes.

    Conclusions:

    • Week-to-week and animal-to-animal variations are significant sources of variability in microarray experiments.
    • Variance component estimates can guide the optimization of experimental parameters, such as the number of animals, arrays per animal, and sections per array.
    • Accurate quantification of variation sources is essential for robust microarray study design and interpretation.