Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Intention-to-treat].

H Faller1

  • 1Stiftungsprofessur Rehabilitationswissenschaften, Universität Würzburg. h.faller@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de

Die Rehabilitation
|February 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The intention-to-treat principle ensures unbiased analysis in controlled trials by including all randomized participants. This method prevents bias from post-hoc exclusions, maintaining the integrity of study results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Supportive care and information needs in relation to quality of life among patients with breast cancer and gynaecological cancer during the time of treatment.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2024
Same author

Factors associated with smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a cohort analysis of the German subset of EuroAspire IV survey.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2020
Same author

Comprehensive assessments and related interventions to enhance the long-term outcomes of child, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors - presentation of the CARE for CAYA-Program study protocol and associated literature review.

BMC cancer·2020
Same author

Evaluation of a self-management patient education programme for fibromyalgia-results of a cluster-RCT in inpatient rehabilitation.

Health education research·2019
Same author

Variations in cardiovascular risk factors in people with and without migration background in Germany - Results from the STAAB cohort study.

International journal of cardiology·2018
Same author

Illness representations, pain and physical function in patients with rheumatic disorders: between- and within-person associations.

Psychology & health·2018
Same journal

[Cooperation in vocational rehabilitation - partnerships and networks as quality indicators].

Die Rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Die Rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

[How do transitions of people with mental disabilities from sheltered workshops to the general labour market succeed? A scoping review].

Die Rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

[Discontinuities in Vocational Rehabilitation: Institutional Frameworks and Biographical Trajectories in Vocational Training Centers (BTZ) and Vocational Rehabilitation Centers (BFW)].

Die Rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

[Impact of psychological comorbidity in women with breast cancer on work participation after medical rehabilitation: A routine data analysis].

Die Rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

[Conformance, Completeness and Plausibility of the Service Classification of Vocational Rehabilitation for Educational Services: A Routine Data Analysis].

Die Rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for evaluating interventions.
  • Analysis of RCT data can be subject to bias if participants are excluded post-randomization.
  • Ensuring the validity of clinical trial results is paramount for evidence-based medicine.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the intention-to-treat principle in clinical trial data analysis.
  • To elucidate the rationale behind analyzing data based on initial random assignment.
  • To highlight the potential biases introduced by excluding participants after randomization.

Main Methods:

  • The tutorial outlines the core logic of the intention-to-treat principle.
  • It contrasts intention-to-treat analysis with methods that exclude participants post-hoc.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The explanation focuses on maintaining the integrity of the randomized allocation.

    • Main Results:

    • Excluding participants after randomization can lead to biased study results.
    • Post-hoc exclusions can create spurious effects not present in the studied population.
    • The intention-to-treat approach effectively avoids these analytical biases.

    Conclusions:

    • The intention-to-treat principle is essential for unbiased analysis in controlled trials.
    • Adherence to intention-to-treat analysis preserves the validity of randomized trial findings.
    • This principle ensures that trial results accurately reflect the treatment effects in the target population.