Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data.

Johan A A Nylander1, Fredrik Ronquist, John P Huelsenbeck

  • 1Department of Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18 D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. johan.nylander@ebc.uu.se

Systematic Biology
|February 18, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accuracy of occurrence and abundance estimates from insect metabarcoding.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Spatial overlap and temporal synchrony between guilds of insect hosts and parasitoids.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

Inferring branch-specific rates of lineage diversification under the birth-death-shift process.

Systematic biology·2026
Same author

HAPP: High-accuracy pipeline for processing deep metabarcoding data.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Small Bugs, Big Data: Metagenomics for Arthropod Biodiversity Monitoring.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Reticulate and Hybrid Speciation is Promoted by Environmental Instability in an Indo-Pacific Species Complex of Whistlers (Aves: Pachycephala).

Molecular ecology·2025
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

Bayesian phylogenetic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) efficiently analyzes complex evolutionary models with combined morphological and molecular data. This approach supports integrating diverse data types for robust evolutionary relationship inference.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Advancements in Bayesian phylogenetic inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) enable complex evolutionary models.
  • Stochastic models are increasingly sophisticated, incorporating diverse data types like morphology.
  • Integrating morphological and molecular data presents analytical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a Bayesian MCMC approach for analyzing combined morphological and molecular data.
  • To infer evolutionary relationships among gall wasps using a multi-dataset approach.
  • To assess the utility of morphological data in multigene phylogenetic analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a Bayesian MCMC framework for combined data set analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied the method to gall wasp data, integrating morphology and four gene sequences (nuclear and mitochondrial).
  • Compared evolutionary models of varying complexity, from simple partitions to complex substitution models with independent parameters per gene.
  • Utilized Bayesian criteria, specifically Bayes factors, for model selection and assessment of parameter importance.

    • Main Results:

    • Bayesian MCMC analysis efficiently handles complex models, showing faster convergence and adequate parameter mixing.
    • Morphological data, despite comprising only 5% of characters, significantly influenced the combined-data phylogenetic tree.
    • Process heterogeneity across data partitions is a significant model component, though less so than among-site rate variation.
    • More complex evolutionary models correlated with increased topological uncertainty and reduced conflict between morphology and molecular data.

    Conclusions:

    • Bayesian MCMC is effective for analyzing complex, combined datasets in phylogenetics.
    • Morphological data remains valuable for multigene phylogenetic analyses.
    • Bayes factors are useful for selecting among complex evolutionary models, but balancing model complexity and parameter estimation accuracy requires further investigation.