Factors influencing central line infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of a single

Adil A H Abbas1, Christopher J H Fryer, Charles Paltiel

  • 1Division of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Nourah Oncology Centre, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Pediatric Blood & Cancer
|February 18, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Central lines in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have high infection rates. Young age and treatment protocol are key risk factors for infection, not catheter type or insertion timing.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Central venous catheters are crucial for treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children.
  • Comparing infection rates between external catheters (ECs) and totally implantable devices (TIDs) is important for patient safety.
  • The timing of catheter insertion may influence infection risk in pediatric ALL patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare infection rates between external catheters (ECs) and totally implantable devices (TIDs) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
  • To evaluate the impact of catheter insertion timing on infection risk in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective and prospective data collection on central line use in children with ALL.
  • Analysis of infection episodes per 1,000 catheter days for ECs and TIDs.
  • Identification of risk factors for infection, including age, treatment protocol, and insertion timing.

Main Results:

  • A high overall infection rate of 3.43 episodes per 1,000 catheter days was observed.
  • Infections were a primary cause of complications, accounting for 51% of line-related issues.
  • Younger age and specific treatment protocols were identified as significant risk factors for initial infections.

Conclusions:

  • Central lines in pediatric ALL patients are associated with a substantial risk of infection.
  • Age and treatment protocol are the primary determinants of infection risk for first-line catheters.
  • Delaying catheter insertion beyond three weeks from diagnosis did not demonstrably lower the infection risk.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos