Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
[Factors predictive of uterine rupture after operative hysteroscopy]
L Sentilhes1, F Sergent, I Popovic
1Clinique Gynécologique et Obstétricale, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, 1, rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex. loicsentilhes@hotmail.com
Objectives:
To identify factors predictive of uterine rupture after operative hysteroscopy. When these factors are present, to search for means to prevent a later uterine rupture. Lastly to specify criteria allowing extraction of the fetus before rupture.
Patients And Methods:
Dramatic description of a case of uterine rupture, in a patient who presented a history of uterine perforation secondary to operative hysteroscopy and retrospective analysis of 12 similar observations reported in the literature.
Results:
Two types of situations must be differentiated: uncomplicated hysteroscopic resection of a polyp or sub-mucous fibroid does not seem to modify the obstetrical outcome; metroplasty for uterine malformation, complex synechia resections, and uterine perforations using monopolar current section are high-risk situations predictive of uterine rupture during pregnancy.
Conclusion:
Uterine ruptures secondary to operative hysteroscopy are rare but serious. They can occur before onset of labor, and compromise vital maternofetal outcome. Risk factors can be identified, but nothing can prevent natural history towards uterine rupture during pregnancy. The obstetrician's vigilance in this context must be extreme searching for the least clinical sign in favor of a pre-rupture of the uterus. Furthermore, systematic caesarean is not justified.
