Related Experiment Videos

Clinical predictors of bacterial versus aseptic meningitis in childhood

C Walsh-Kelly1, D B Nelson, D S Smith

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

Insights

Meningeal signs are unreliable for diagnosing meningitis in infants under 12 months. A high suspicion for meningitis is crucial in febrile infants, regardless of physical findings.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Meningitis diagnosis in children relies on clinical signs, but their reliability varies with age.
  • Meningeal signs are key indicators, yet their predictive value in young children is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of meningeal signs and other physical findings in identifying bacterial and aseptic meningitis across different pediatric age groups.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective evaluation of children under 17 years old requiring lumbar puncture.
  • Assessment of meningeal signs and physical parameters before lumbar puncture in 172 children with confirmed meningitis.

Main Results:

  • Nuchal rigidity was significantly less common in infants (0-6 months) with bacterial (27%) or aseptic (3%) meningitis compared to older children (95% and 79%, respectively).
  • Seventy-two percent of infants (≤12 months) with bacterial meningitis had positive meningeal signs, versus 17% with aseptic meningitis.
  • In children over 12 months, 85% showed at least one positive meningeal sign, regardless of meningitis type.

Conclusions:

  • Meningeal signs have limited reliability in diagnosing meningitis in infants 12 months and younger.
  • A high index of suspicion for meningitis is essential in febrile infants under 12 months, even without clear meningeal signs.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos