Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Smooth pursuit under stimulus-response uncertainty.

Marian Berryhill1, Kestutis Kveraga, Leanne Boucher

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Marian.berryhilll@dartmouth.edu

Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research
|February 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Association of Preoperative Cognitive Dysfunction to Common Intraoperative Electroencephalographic Parameters and Cerebral Hypoxia During Cardiac Surgery.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026
Same author

Perioperative Multimodal General Anesthesia Focusing on Specific Central Nervous System Targets Does Not Reduce Postoperative Interleukin-6 and Neurofilament Light Levels in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2025
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Crowdsourcing multiverse analyses to explore the impact of different data-processing and analysis decisions: A tutorial.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

Escape from traditional learning: A neuroscience escape room activity for neuroscience education.

Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Sleep-Based Brain Age Is Reduced in Advanced Inner Engineering Meditators.

Mindfulness·2025
Same journal

Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

On the neural basis of focused and divided attention.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Task difficulty in a simultaneous face matching task modulates activity in face fusiform area.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

The role of the left Brodmann's areas 44 and 45 in reading words and pseudowords.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Individual differences in brain activity during visuo-spatial processing assessed by slow cortical potentials and LORETA.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
See all related articles

Reaction times for smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEMs) are unaffected by uncertainty, unlike joystick tracking. This suggests SPEMs benefit less from pre-programming compared to joystick tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Hick's Law posits that reaction time (RT) increases with the logarithm of the number of choices due to increasing uncertainty.
  • Simple Reaction Time (SRT) tasks involve one stimulus and one response, while Choice Reaction Time (CRT) tasks involve multiple stimuli and responses.
  • Understanding RT differences is crucial for designing effective interfaces and predicting human performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of response uncertainty on reaction times for smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEMs) and joystick tracking.
  • To compare the RT patterns of SPEMs and joystick tracking with predictions from Hick's Law.
  • To determine if pre-programming benefits are evident in SPEMs versus joystick control.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants performed SRT and CRT tasks using both a joystick and by tracking a visual target with their eyes (SPEMs).
  • The number of choices/uncertainty levels were systematically varied for the CRT conditions.
  • Reaction times were measured for each condition and participant.

Main Results:

  • SPEM reaction times showed no significant increase with increasing uncertainty (number of choices).
  • Joystick tracking reaction times exhibited a step increase between SRT and CRT, but no further significant increase beyond two choices.
  • This indicates a potential benefit of pre-programming for joystick control, but not for SPEMs.

Conclusions:

  • Smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEMs) appear to operate differently from joystick tracking concerning response uncertainty.
  • The findings suggest that the pre-programming of movements may confer an advantage in joystick control that is not present in SPEMs.
  • This challenges the universal applicability of Hick's Law to all motor control tasks involving visual feedback and response selection.