Related Experiment Videos
Pragmatic principles--methodological pragmatism in the principle-based approach to bioethics
1Marburg University, Marburg, Germany. h.s.felzmann@gmx.de
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|February 20, 2004
Summary
This study argues that Beauchamp and Childress's principle-based bioethics approach is pragmatic. It explores methodological pragmatism as a justification method, finding commonalities with the principle-based approach in moral justification.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Philosophy of Science
Background:
- The principle-based approach to bioethics by Beauchamp and Childress is widely influential.
- Understanding the philosophical underpinnings of ethical justification is crucial for bioethical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To argue that Beauchamp and Childress's principle-based approach to bioethics possesses significant pragmatic features.
- To explore methodological pragmatism as a method of justification, drawing on William James.
- To identify commonalities between methodological pragmatism and Beauchamp and Childress's proposals on moral justification.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of William James's philosophy of pragmatism.
- Examination of Beauchamp and Childress's fifth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2001).
- Comparative analysis of methodological pragmatism and the principle-based approach to bioethics.
Main Results:
- Methodological pragmatism offers a robust framework for understanding justification.
- The principle-based approach in bioethics exhibits strong pragmatic characteristics.
- Several shared aspects exist between methodological pragmatism and the principle-based approach regarding moral justification.
Conclusions:
- Beauchamp and Childress's principle-based bioethics aligns with pragmatic philosophy.
- Pragmatism provides a valuable lens for analyzing and justifying bioethical principles.
- Further exploration of pragmatic elements can enrich bioethical theory and practice.