Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
Oral immunoglobulin for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm and low birth-weight neonates
Insights
Oral immunoglobulins (IgG or IgG/IgA) do not significantly reduce necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) incidence in preterm neonates. Current evidence does not support routine use for NEC prevention in this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Gastroenterology
- Immunology
Background:
- Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a critical gastrointestinal emergency in neonates.
- Previous research suggested oral immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG) may offer gastrointestinal protection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of oral immunoglobulin in preventing NEC in preterm and low birth-weight neonates.
- To assess for any associated adverse effects.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
- Searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and hand-searched relevant proceedings.
- Included trials involving oral immunoglobulins for NEC prophylaxis in neonates <37 weeks gestation or <2500g.
Main Results:
- Three trials with 2095 neonates met inclusion criteria.
- Oral IgG or IgG/IgA did not significantly decrease definite NEC, suspected NEC, need for surgery, or NEC-related mortality.
- No significant reduction in NEC incidence was observed (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.57-1.25).
Conclusions:
- Available evidence does not support the use of oral immunoglobulin for NEC prevention.
- Further research is needed, as no trials specifically investigated oral IgA alone for NEC prevention.
Background:
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common emergency of the gastrointestinal tract occurring in the neonatal period. There have been published reports which suggest that oral immunoglobulins IgA and IgG produce an immunoprotective effect in the gastrointestinal mucosa. This systematic review was undertaken to clarify the issue.
Objectives:
To assess whether oral immunoglobulin administered to preterm and low birth-weight neonates reduces the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis without adverse effects.
Search Strategy:
The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE (1966 to October 26, 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003) were searched. Proceedings of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand were hand searched. The computer neonatal discussion site 'Nicu Net' was also used. Additionally, all references in the identified trials were checked and authors were contacted to request any additional published or unpublished data. No new trials were identified.
Selection Criteria:
All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials where oral immunoglobulins were used as prophylaxis against necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm (<37 weeks gestation) and/or low birth-weight (<2500 gms) neonates.
Data Collection And Analysis:
The procedures of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG) were used. The two reviewers independently assessed the trials for their methodological quality and subsequent inclusion in the review. Relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), and number needed to treat (NNT) were used in the analysis.
Main Results:
Five studies on oral immunoglobulin for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis were identified of which three met the inclusion criteria. In this review of the three eligible trials (including a total of 2095 neonates) the oral administration of IgG or an IgG/IgA combination did not result in a significant reduction in the incidence of definite NEC [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.57, 1.25), RD -0.01 (95% CI -0.03, 0.01)], suspected NEC [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.49, 1.46), RD -0.01 (95% CI -0.02, 0.01)], need for surgery [RR 0.21 (95% CI 0.02, 1.75), RD -0.03 (95% CI -0.06, 0.00)] or death from NEC [RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.47, 2.59), RD 0.00 (95% CI -0.01, 0.01)].
Reviewer'S Conclusions:
Based on the available trials, the evidence does not support the administration of oral immunoglobulin for the prevention of NEC. There are no randomised controlled trials of oral IgA alone for the prevention of NEC.
Related Concept Videos
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Transcytosis of IgG
IgG molecules from a mother undergo transcytosis starting around 13 weeks of gestation. The amount of IgG transferred and entering the fetal blood circulation increases with...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...

