Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Arsenic-sulfides confound anion exchange resin speciation of aqueous arsenic
Jenny Ayla Jay1, Nicole Keon Blute, Harold F Hemond
1Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California Los Angeles, 5732H Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1593, USA. jjay@seas.ucla.edu
Abstract:
A field-portable anion exchange resin method (often cited as the Ficklin method (1983)) has been extensively used to distinguish between dissolved arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) species in natural waters. As(III) occurs largely as As(OH)(3), which is uncharged at ca. pH 7, while As(V) is negatively charged and will sorb to the resin. However, we show that negatively charged As(III)-sulfide (thioarsenite) species, important at sulfide concentrations >10 microM, also bind to the anion exchange resins, and therefore might be interpreted incorrectly as As(V). Furthermore, we show that nitrogen-purging, which results in a conversion of As(III)-sulfides to arsenite, can be used to obtain accurate arsenic speciation when resins are used on sulfidic water samples.
More Related Videos
08:21Determination of Inorganic Arsenic in a Wide Range of Food Matrices using Hydride Generation - Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.
Published on: September 1, 2017
06:52Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron (Oxy)Hydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria
Published on: December 19, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Ion Exchange
Ion-Exchange Chromatography
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...