Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learner-centered versus automatic adaptive motor skill training.

B H Williges1, R C Williges

  • 1Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, 130 Whittemore Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 1, 1977
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Varying the type and number of adaptive variables in continuous tracking.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Remote measurement methods for user-centered design of telesupport systems.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2003
Same author

Empirical models based on free-modulus magnitude estimation of perceived presence in virtual environments.

Human factors·1998
Same author

Data bases of accommodative aids for computer users with disabilities.

Human factors·1990
Same author

The intelligibility of synthesized speech in data inquiry systems.

Human factors·1988
Same author

Assaying and isolating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system.

Human factors·1987
Same journal

Preferential Cup Size and End-State Comfort in Children.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Learner-centered training improved pursuit-tracking performance. While initial training took longer for females, both sexes performed similarly in the tracking task transfer.

Area of Science:

  • Motor learning and skill acquisition
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Cognitive psychology

Background:

  • Understanding effective training methodologies is crucial for skill development.
  • Pursuit-tracking tasks are valuable for assessing motor control and learning.
  • Investigating sex-based differences in learning rates and performance is important.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of three training methods (fixed-difficulty, automatic-adaptive, learner-centered) on a pursuit-tracking task.
  • To examine transfer of learning after different training protocols.
  • To investigate potential sex differences in training time and task performance.

Main Methods:

  • 18 male and 18 female students were taught a 2D pursuit-tracking task using three distinct training types.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A 7-minute tracking session with shifting difficulty measured learning transfer.
  • Training time and tracking error were recorded as outcome measures.

    • Main Results:

    • Learner-centered training resulted in significantly less tracking error during transfer compared to other methods.
    • No significant differences in training time were observed between the training types.
    • Females, on average, required twice the training time compared to males, but showed no performance differences during transfer.

    Conclusions:

    • Learner-centered training approaches enhance skill transfer in pursuit-tracking tasks.
    • While initial learning pace may differ between sexes, ultimate task performance in transfer is comparable.
    • Prior experience with motor-control tasks may influence individual training duration.