Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Assessing Therapeutic Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Hindlimb Ischemia
Published on: June 8, 2019
Patency and limb salvage rates after distal revascularization to unclampable calcified outflow arteries
Enzo Ballotta1, Laura Renon, Michele Toffano
1Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy. enzo.ballotta@unipd.it
Insights
Severe arterial calcification in the legs does not significantly impact bypass graft success for limb salvage. This study found similar patency and limb salvage rates in calcified versus uncalcified arteries, suggesting it's not a barrier to surgery.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiovascular Research
- Arterial Disease
Background:
- Severe circumferential calcification of outflow arteries is a known negative prognostic factor for bypass graft patency in lower-extremity distal revascularization.
- Assessing the impact of unclampable, calcified infrapopliteal arteries on bypass graft outcomes is crucial for limb salvage strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the influence of severe circumferential infrapopliteal arterial calcification on bypass graft patency and limb salvage rates.
- To compare outcomes between distal revascularization in unclampable calcified outflow arteries versus uncalcified arteries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 441 distal bypass graft procedures (July 1990-July 1997).
- Comparison of 69 cases with unclampable calcified outflow vessels (Group I) against 83 cases with uncalcified outflow vessels (Group II).
- Kaplan-Meier analysis used to assess primary/secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival rates.
Main Results:
- Group I (calcified) had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (88% vs. 65%) and renal failure (17% vs. 5%).
- Primary patency rates at 5 years were 52% (Group I) vs. 69% (Group II) (P=0.07).
- Secondary patency (82% vs. 85%) and limb salvage rates (81% vs. 86%) at 5 years showed no significant difference between groups (P=0.58 and P=0.39, respectively).
Conclusions:
- Distal revascularization to severely calcified outflow arteries yields comparable results to those in uncalcified arteries.
- Circumferential calcification of the distal recipient artery should not preclude bypass graft surgery for limb salvage.
Purpose:
Severe circumferential calcification of the outflow artery during lower-extremity distal revascularization is considered a poor prognostic factor for bypass graft patency. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of circumferential infrapopliteal arterial calcification on bypass graft patency and limb salvage rates, comparing patency and limb salvage rates in unclampable calcified distal outflow arteries with those observed in uncalcified distal outflow arteries.
Methods:
From July 1990 to July 1997, of 441 distal bypass graft procedures performed by the same surgeon, 69 (16%, group I) involved unclampable calcified outflow vessels, whereas 83 (19%, group II) outflow vessels were uncalcified; the other 289 (65%) had varying intermediate degrees of calcification and were not included in this analysis. All procedures were performed for limb-threatening ischemia and involved standard vein patch angioplasty of the distal anastomotic site, irrespective of the conduit used. Primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival rates were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Results:
Groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and atherosclerotic risk factors except for a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (88% vs 65%, P =.001) and renal failure (17% vs 5%, P =.01), including dialysis dependency (P =.01) in group I. Gangrene as an indication for surgery was statistically more frequent in group I (49% vs 29%, P =.01). The distal anastomotic locations and types of conduit involved were similar in the two groups. The femoral inflow level was used more often in group II (63% vs 38%, P =.003), the popliteal in group I (32% vs 17%, P =.03). Follow-up ranged from 30 days to 144 months, with a mean of 69 months. None of the patients were lost during the follow-up period. None of the patients died during the perioperative (30-day) period. Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 84%, 65%, and 52% for group I and 89%, 76%, and 69% for group II (P =.07.). Secondary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 82%, and 78% for group I and 96%, 85%, and 82% for group II (P =.58). Limb salvage rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93%, 83%, and 81% for group I and 97%, 90%, and 86% for group II (P =.39).
Conclusions:
Distal revascularization to unclampable, severely calcified outflow arteries can achieve much the same results to those obtained in uncalcified outflow arteries. A circumferentially calcified distal recipient artery should not be considered a major obstacle to an attempt at limb salvage bypass graft surgery.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
08:16High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Footpad Vasculature in a Murine Hindlimb Gangrene Model
Published on: March 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation