Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The instantiation principle re-evaluated.

Els De Wilde1, Veerle Vanoverberghe, Gert Storms

  • 1University of Leuven, Belgium.

Memory (Hove, England)
|February 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-reported availability of research data in American Psychological Association journal articles: a cross-sectional investigation.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same author

Adventitious Error and Its Implications for Testing Relations Between Variables and for Composite Measurement Outcomes.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

ABAS-3 for Belgium: standardisation, psychometric properties and guidelines for fair assessment.

International journal of developmental disabilities·2026
Same author

Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Adventitious Error and Its Implications for Testing Relations Between Variables and for Composite Measurement Outcomes.

Psychometrika·2024
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

The instantiation principle accurately predicts category typicality. Multiple instantiations improve predictions, and the principle holds across different concept levels, refuting alternative explanations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Concept Formation
  • Categorization

Background:

  • The instantiation principle, proposed by Heit and Barsalou (1996), explains how typicality judgments are made within conceptual categories.
  • Previous research has explored the predictive power of this principle in various contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the predictive accuracy of the instantiation principle across different conceptual levels.
  • To compare the predictive performance of single versus multiple instantiations.
  • To evaluate alternative explanations for findings related to the instantiation principle.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three experiments examining the instantiation principle.
  • Predicted mean typicalities of subordinate categories within superordinate concepts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed typicality predictions at both higher and lower conceptual levels.
  • Analyzed the correspondence between observed and predicted standard deviations.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean typicalities were accurately predicted for subordinate categories within superordinates.
    • Multiple instantiations yielded slightly better prediction accuracy than single instantiations.
    • The instantiation principle successfully predicted typicalities at lower conceptual levels.
    • An alternative account of Heit and Barsalou's findings was empirically refuted.

    Conclusions:

    • The instantiation principle demonstrates strong predictive power for category typicality.
    • The principle's validity extends across different conceptual hierarchies.
    • The reliability of standard deviation predictions warrants caution due to potential biases.