Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations
Hidemi Itoh1, Angelo A Caputo, Toshifumi Kuroe
1Division of Stomatognathic Physiology and Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Abstract:
The effect of buccolingual staggered implant placement on stress distribution within the supporting structure was examined photoelastically. Two photoelastic models of a human mandible, edentulous distal to the canine, were fabricated. Three screw-type implants were embedded into the edentulous region of each model. The implants were placed in a straight line in one model and in a buccolingual staggered configuration in the other. Vertical and lateral loads were applied to a fixed partial denture superstructure. No clear biomechanical advantage to a staggered 1.5 mm buccal and lingual offset placement configuration was observed.