Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lawsuits and secondhand smoke.

E L Sweda1

  • 1Tobacco Control Resource Center, Northeastern University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. ed@tplp.org

Tobacco Control
|February 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Litigation over secondhand smoke (SHS) has grown since 1976, with increasing success for non-smoking litigants. These successful cases protect public health and encourage smoke-free environments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Litigation on behalf of victims of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. The experience from the USA.

European journal of public health·2001
Same author

Is RJR still going after the "kiddie" market?

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2000
Same author

Protecting children from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Tobacco control·1998
Same author

Tobacco industry tactics.

British medical bulletin·1996
Same author

Local values versus tobacco industry power. The experience of GASP of Massachusetts.

New York state journal of medicine·1985

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health Law
  • Public Health Policy
  • Tort Litigation

Background:

  • Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure poses significant health risks.
  • Litigation has been a key strategy in addressing SHS exposure.
  • Legal precedents are evolving to protect non-smokers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze trends in SHS litigation over 25 years.
  • To identify factors contributing to litigant success in SHS cases.
  • To forecast the impact of legal trends on future litigation.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive review of over 420 SHS exposure cases since the 1980s.
  • Utilized legal databases (LexisNexis, Westlaw) and traditional law library research.
  • Incorporated information from personal correspondence and media reports.

Main Results:

  • SHS litigation has increased in frequency and scope since 1976.
  • Litigants have achieved increasing success in SHS exposure cases.
  • The judiciary increasingly recognizes the need to protect public health from SHS.

Conclusions:

  • Successful SHS lawsuits benefit public health by establishing legal pathways for others.
  • Litigation success encourages voluntary adoption of smoke-free policies by businesses.
  • The evolving legal landscape supports greater protection against SHS exposure.

Related Experiment Videos