Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Effectiveness of right or left radial approach for coronary angiography
Osamu Kawashima1, Norio Endoh, Masayoshi Terashima
1Heart Center, Sendai Kosei Hospital, Sendai, Japan. uh9t-tsm@asahi-net.or.jp
Insights
The left radial approach for coronary angiography offers improved procedural efficiency compared to the right radial approach, with shorter catheter manipulation and fluoroscopy times. This transradial catheterization technique may be preferred by experienced operators.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access
Background:
- The transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly utilized for cardiac catheterization procedures.
- Current selection of the radial artery (right vs. left) is typically based on operator preference.
- Limited data exists on the comparative effectiveness of left versus right radial artery access for coronary angiography.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of radial artery laterality on the effectiveness of coronary angiography.
- To compare procedural outcomes between left radial artery access and right radial artery access.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 232 patients undergoing coronary angiography via the left radial approach and 205 patients via the right radial approach.
- Utilized Judkins-type catheters for all procedures.
- Key metrics assessed included access time, catheter manipulation duration, total procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and guidewire usage.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in arterial access time was observed between the left and right radial groups.
- Shorter catheter manipulation duration (9.8 ± 4.4 min vs. 11.7 ± 5.9 min) and total procedural duration (11.4 ± 4.8 min vs. 13.7 ± 6.4 min) were noted in the left radial group (P < 0.001 for both).
- Left radial approach resulted in significantly shorter fluoroscopy times (3.7 ± 2.5 min vs. 5.0 ± 3.3 min; P < 0.001) and reduced guidewire use (0/232 vs. 20/205; P < 0.001) due to right subclavian artery tortuosity.
Conclusions:
- The left radial approach demonstrates superior procedural efficacy for coronary angiography compared to the right radial approach in experienced operators.
- Shorter manipulation and fluoroscopy times associated with the left radial approach may lead to improved patient outcomes and reduced radiation exposure.
- The anatomical challenges of the right subclavian artery may contribute to increased difficulty and guidewire use in the right radial approach.
Abstract:
The transradial approach for catheterization is becoming increasingly more popular. At present, the choice of the right or left radial artery depends on the operator's preference. We examined how the laterality influenced the effectiveness of the approach. Employing Judkins-type catheters, we performed coronary angiography in 232 patients with the left approach and in 205 patients with the right approach. Although access time did not differ between the two groups of patients, the duration of catheter manipulation was shorter in the left- than in the right-approach group (11.7 +/- 5.9 vs. 9.8 +/- 4.4 min; P < 0.001). Because of the shorter duration of catheter manipulation, the total procedural duration was shorter in the left-approach group (13.7 +/- 6.4 vs. 11.4 +/- 4.8 min; P < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time was shorter in the left- than in the right-approach group (3.7 +/- 2.5 vs. 5.0 +/- 3.3 min; P < 0.001). The amount of contrast material did not differ between the groups (79 +/- 27 vs. 83 +/- 25 ml). The rate of guidewire usage to engage the coronary ostium was higher in the right- than in the left-approach group because of the severe tortuosity of the right subclavian artery (20/205 vs. 0/232; P < 0.001). Thus, for operators with significant experience, the left radial approach may provide increased procedural efficacy for coronary angiography compared to the right radial approach.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview