Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
Published on: May 10, 2016
Attorney-directed screenings can be hazardous
David Egilman1, Susanna Rankin Bohme
1Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Background:
The history of occupational health screenings indicate that they are often necessary to protect the health and interests of workers. However, medical screenings for asbestos and other occupational diseases which are organized and funded by attorneys may result in serious adverse outcomes to those screened.
Methods:
We report a case of death that appears to have been heavily influenced by an attorney-initiated and -directed screening program.
Results:
While well-run medical screening programs are essential to disease detection in workers, attorney-run and corporate screenings can be fraught with ethical and practical problems. Screenings have been used by corporations to identify workers with occupational illness in order to terminate their employment and avoid legal liability. Screenings can also be used to motivate workers to stop smoking and implement workplace controls. However, these screenings must be conducted responsibly.
Conclusions:
Although this is only one case it illustrates the gravity and potential danger of attorney-directed screening programs.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
