Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

11:12
Optimization of a Multiplex RNA-based Expression Assay Using Breast Cancer Archival Material
Published on: August 1, 2018
c-kit and SCF expression in normal and tumor breast tissue
Paola Ulivi1, Wainer Zoli, Laura Medri
1Department of Medical Oncology, Forlì, Italy.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
|March 6, 2004
Summary
The c-kit/SCF pathway is crucial for normal mammary gland growth. Its expression significantly decreases during breast cancer progression, suggesting a role in malignant transformation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Cell Biology
- Molecular Pathology
Background:
- The c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), are implicated in normal cell development and the growth of certain tumors.
- Previous research on c-kit and SCF in breast cancer has yielded conflicting results due to varied methodologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the expression patterns of c-kit and SCF in normal, in situ, and invasive breast cancer tissues.
- To evaluate the impact of different analytical methods on the observed expression levels of c-kit and SCF.
- To determine the role of the c-kit/SCF pathway in breast cancer development and progression.
Main Methods:
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for protein expression.
- In situ hybridization (ISH) for mRNA expression.
- Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for mRNA expression.
Main Results:
- IHC and ISH revealed high c-kit and SCF expression in normal mammary epithelium, with significant decreases in in situ and invasive cancers.
- RT-PCR detected mRNA expression in all sample types, potentially due to high sensitivity or detection of non-tumor cells.
- Morphological approaches were deemed most reliable for identifying the cellular source of c-kit/SCF expression.
Conclusions:
- The c-kit/SCF pathway is vital for maintaining normal mammary epithelial growth.
- Malignant transformation of breast tissue is associated with a progressive loss of c-kit and SCF expression.
- Methodological differences significantly influence study outcomes; morphological assessments are critical for accurate interpretation.

