[Controversies in endocrine therapy for breast cancer]

Major advances have been made in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Although tamoxifen has been the standard endocrine therapy for the past twenty years, the development of a third generation of aromatase inhibitors (Als), which effectively inhibit estrogen synthesis in extragonadal sites, gives us a wider range of choices in endocrine therapy. However, many questions remain with respect to the optimal use of Als. Differences between Als and tamoxifen as well as non-steroidal and steroidal Als in their long-term adverse effects on bone demineralization and lipid metabolism are only starting to emerge. The preferable orders for use of non-steroidal and steroidal Als, Als and pure anti-estrogen in patients with metastatic disease are emerging subjects to be examined, following several studies that showed non-cross reactivity between these types of drug. Neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy is now attempting to apply breast conserving surgery in larger numbers of elderly patients who are not suitable for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, many investigators are currently searching for surrogate markers in neo-adjuvant endocrine treatment that can predict the responsiveness and prognosis with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Further research concomitant with clinical trials may lead to a more reliable endocrine therapy modality in the treatment of breast cancer.