Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of 3
Ross C Brownson1, Jen Jen Chang, Amy A Eyler
1Department of Community Health and Prevention Research Center, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St Louis, MO, USA. brownson@slu.edu
Objectives:
We tested the reliability of 3 instruments that assessed social and physical environments.
Methods:
We conducted a test-retest study among US adults (n = 289). We used telephone survey methods to measure suitableness of the perceived (vs objective) environment for recreational physical activity and nonmotorized transportation.
Results:
Most questions in our surveys that attempted to measure specific characteristics of the built environment showed moderate to high reliability. Questions about the social environment showed lower reliability than those that assessed the physical environment. Certain blocks of questions appeared to be selectively more reliable for urban or rural respondents.
Conclusions:
Despite differences in content and in response formats, all 3 surveys showed evidence of reliability, and most items are now ready for use in research and in public health surveillance.
