Related Experiment Videos
[Aggressive conservative treatment remains the best option for oesophageal perforation in children]
S Rivas1, L Martínez, F Hernández
1Departamento de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Infantil "La Paz", Madrid.
Insights
Prompt non-operative treatment for pediatric oesophageal perforations (OP) ensures survival and organ function. This conservative strategy remains the preferred initial choice for children, yielding successful outcomes in most cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Thoracic Surgery
Context:
- Oesophageal perforation (OP) in children presents unique challenges compared to adults.
- Historically, non-operative management has been favored for pediatric OP.
- This study evaluates the long-term efficacy of non-operative treatment for pediatric OP.
Purpose:
- To assess the effectiveness and outcomes of non-operative management for oesophageal perforations in pediatric patients.
- To determine if the traditional non-operative approach for pediatric OP remains a viable and successful strategy over time.
Summary:
- A retrospective analysis of 19 oesophageal perforation episodes in 17 children (aged 5.3 years) treated between 1991 and 2001 was conducted.
- The majority of perforations (18/19) closed successfully without direct surgical intervention, with prompt, aggressive non-operative management initiated within 24 hours in most cases.
- While most patients survived and retained oesophageal function, two required oesophageal replacement for severe strictures, and one patient with esophageal necrosis underwent organ replacement.
Impact:
- Non-operative management of paediatric oesophageal perforations is associated with high survival rates and preservation of oesophageal function.
- This conservative approach should be considered the primary therapeutic strategy for oesophageal perforations in children.
- The findings support the continued use of prompt, aggressive non-operative treatment as the first-line therapy for paediatric oesophageal perforations.
Unlabelled:
Oesophageal perforation (OP) requires prompt and vigorous treatment. In contrast with adult patients in whom surgical closure of perforation is preferred, non-operative treatment has been the usual approach in children. The present report aims at assessing whether this strategy stands the passage of time. We studied retrospectively the charts of patients treated at our institution for OP between 1991 and 2001. Between these years, we treated 19 episodes of OP in 17 patients aged 5.3 +/- 0,94 years. In 9 cases (4 lye burns, 3 oesophageal atresias, 1 bullous epidermolysis and 1 mucocutaneous candidiasis) OP occurred during dilatation of strictures. Foreign body extraction was the cause in 3 cases, and blunt trauma and sclerosis of varices were the causes in 2 cases each. The last child had multiple gastrointestinal perforation during treatment for leukaemia. Subcutaneous emphysema was seen in 7 instances, pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax in 14, pleural effusion in 9, dyspnoea in 9, severe thoracic pain in 1 and pericardial effusion in 1. The diagnosis was intraoperative in only 2 children but the symptoms and imaging signs prompted vigorous treatment within the first 24 hours in 15 instances. One or more pleural tubes were inserted in 11 cases and pericardial drainage was required once. Perforations closed without direct surgery in 18/19 episodes (16/17 children). Five gastrotomies and 2 jejunostomies were performed and several major abdominal operations were necessary to repair concurrent lesions in a child who sustained severe blunt abdominal trauma and in the one with leukaemic perforations. All these patients survive and all recovered oesophageal function although 2 with intractable lye structures ultimately required oesophageal replacement 6 and 10 months after OP. The only patient in whom direct approach for esophageal necrosis after variceal endosclerosis was unavoidable lost her organ and had a replacement after a successful porto-systemic shunt.
Conclusions:
Prompt and aggressive non-operative approach of oesophageal perforations in children allows survival and conservation of the organ and its function in most cases and should remain the first therapeutic choice at this age.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care