Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal fraction collecting in preparative LC/MS.

Ulrich Rosentreter1, Udo Huber

  • 1Pharma Research, Bayer HealthCare AG, 42096 Wuppertal, Germany.

Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry
|March 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an optimal fraction collection method combining UV and mass detection in chromatography. This approach enhances collector efficiency by selectively isolating desired compounds, minimizing waste and contamination.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Freezing the Bioactive Conformation to Boost Potency: The Identification of BAY 85-8501, a Selective and Potent Inhibitor of Human Neutrophil Elastase for Pulmonary Diseases.

ChemMedChem·2015
Same author

Biosynthetic characterization and chemoenzymatic assembly of the cryptophycins. Potent anticancer agents from cyanobionts.

ACS chemical biology·2007
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography
  • Mass Spectrometry

Background:

  • High-throughput chromatography requires efficient fraction collection to isolate compounds.
  • UV-triggered fractionation offers precision but can be wasteful.
  • Mass-triggered fractionation improves efficiency but risks peak overlap contamination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and demonstrate an improved fraction collection strategy for preparative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS).
  • To optimize the use of fraction collector space in high-throughput analyses.
  • To minimize sample contamination by employing a dual-trigger collection method.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of UV-triggered, mass-triggered, and combined UV/mass-triggered fraction collection methods.
  • Implementation of a logical AND combination for UV- and mass-triggered collection in preparative LC/MS.
  • Validation of the optimal collection mode using three distinct experimental examples.

Main Results:

  • UV-triggered collection is precise but inefficient, collecting unwanted compounds.
  • Mass-triggered collection is more efficient but susceptible to contamination from broader mass peaks.
  • The combined UV- and mass-triggered collection strategy significantly improved fraction purity and collector space utilization.
  • Demonstrated success of the AND combination method across three different sample types.

Conclusions:

  • A combined UV- and mass-triggered fraction collection strategy represents an optimal approach for preparative LC/MS.
  • This dual-trigger method enhances the efficiency and purity of compound isolation in high-throughput chromatography.
  • The findings provide a practical solution for maximizing the utility of fraction collectors in complex separation workflows.

Related Experiment Videos