Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing risk using different cholesterol-screening methods.

R G Bowden1, P M Kingery, D M Rust

  • 1Baylor University, PO Box 97313, Waco, TX 76798, USA. rodney_bowden@baylor.edu

Public Health
|March 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrooptic Fabry-Perot filter: development for the study of solar oscillations.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Low relative skeletal muscle mass indicative of sarcopenia is associated with elevations in serum uric acid levels: findings from NHANES III.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2009
Same author

Risk/benefit profile of arsenic trioxide.

The oncologist·2001
Same author

Nutritional issues in patients with severe neutropenia.

Seminars in oncology nursing·2000
Same author

Effects of sex composition by class and instructor's sex on physical self-efficacy of college men.

Perceptual and motor skills·2000
Same author

Recognizing and managing anemia.

Clinical journal of oncology nursing·2000
Same journal

Associations of age, health literacy, BMI, tobacco use, and COVID-19 infection history with sexual dysfunction among COVID-19 survivors: A multicenter study.

Public health·2026
Same journal

Costing the mental health harms of sexual and physical violence in adulthood: A prevalence-based analysis in England.

Public health·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of interventions to support healthcare workers' mental health and well-being: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.

Public health·2026
Same journal

Using Ripple Effects Mapping to translate an innovative service model for children with disabilities in Lusaka, Zambia.

Public health·2026
Same journal

Phenotyping population-level chronic condition prevalence: The importance of forcing factors from the ecological framework.

Public health·2026
Same journal

Multifactorial predictive model for nurses' intention to correct online health misinformation: A machine-learning and SHAP analysis.

Public health·2026
See all related articles

Total capillary cholesterol screening is unreliable, showing high false negative rates. Health educators should avoid using this method for heart disease risk assessment or patient referrals.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Cardiovascular Health
  • Diagnostic Accuracy

Background:

  • Cholesterol screening is crucial for identifying cardiovascular disease risk.
  • Accurate cholesterol measurement is essential for effective risk assessment and patient management.
  • The validity of capillary blood sampling for cholesterol screening requires careful evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of total capillary cholesterol measurements against established methods.
  • To determine if total capillary cholesterol is a reliable biomarker for cholesterol screening programs.
  • To assess the clinical utility of capillary blood cholesterol in identifying individuals at risk for heart disease.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of total capillary cholesterol values with total venous cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of cholesterol screening data from 285 employee participants.
  • Calculation of false negative rates for total capillary cholesterol compared to other lipid measures.
  • Main Results:

    • Total capillary cholesterol exhibited false negative rates ranging from 17.21% to 34.4% when compared to other cholesterol measurement methods.
    • Significant discrepancies were observed, indicating a high potential for misclassification of cholesterol levels.
    • The accuracy of capillary cholesterol testing was found to be insufficient for reliable screening.

    Conclusions:

    • Total capillary cholesterol is not a valid or reliable measure for cholesterol screening due to significant inaccuracies.
    • Health educators should refrain from using total capillary cholesterol to predict heart disease risk or guide patient referrals.
    • Venous blood sampling or more accurate diagnostic methods are recommended for effective cholesterol assessment.