Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome.

Larry E Humes1

  • 1Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7002, USA.

Trends in Amplification
|March 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individuals with near-normal audiograms but perceived hearing difficulties can achieve aided outcomes on par with those of peers with mild hearing loss.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of the Global Score From the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing-Aid Performance and the Development of an Improved Shorter Version: The APHAP9.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Online-administered hearing handicap inventory: evaluation of reliability and item-order effects.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Reexamination of Data on the Acclimatization of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Experienced Hearing Aid Wearers as Controls.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Some Considerations for the Use of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) as a Hearing-Aid Outcome Measure.

Trends in hearing·2025
Same author

A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Self-Fit Methods to the Best-Practices Method of Hearing Aid Fitting.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
See all related articles

Factor analysis of hearing aid outcomes in elderly adults revealed key factors influencing speech recognition, usage, and satisfaction. Prefit variables like hearing loss and cognition predict performance, while prior use predicts usage, and sound quality predicts satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Gerontology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Hearing aid outcome measures are complex and influenced by various factors.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing hearing aid use and satisfaction in elderly adults.
  • Previous research has explored different hearing aid technologies and their impact on outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply factor analysis to hearing aid outcome measures in elderly adults.
  • To identify the principal components that capture individual differences in hearing aid outcomes.
  • To investigate the extent to which prefit variables predict different dimensions of hearing aid outcome.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of three studies involving a total of over 500 elderly hearing aid users.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of principal components factor analysis to a comprehensive set of outcome measures.
  • Multiple regression analyses to assess the predictive power of prefit variables on outcome dimensions.

    • Main Results:

    • Factor analysis identified 3-5 principal components explaining individual differences in hearing aid outcomes, irrespective of hearing aid type or circuitry.
    • Speech recognition performance was well predicted by hearing loss, cognitive function, and age.
    • Hearing aid usage was best predicted by prior hearing aid use, and satisfaction by aided sound quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Individual differences in hearing aid outcomes can be systematically analyzed using factor analysis.
    • Prefit variables have varying predictive power across different outcome dimensions.
    • Further large-scale multicenter studies are needed to develop comprehensive models for optimizing hearing aid outcomes.