Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026
Detection and Isolation of Circulating Melanoma Cells using Photoacoustic Flowmetry
Published on: November 25, 2011
Quantitative detection of circulating tumor cells in cutaneous and ocular melanoma and quality assessment by
Ulrich Keilholz1, Petra Goldin-Lang, Nikolaos E Bechrakis
1Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany. ulrich.keilholz@medizin.fu-berlin.de
Purpose:
Inconsistent reports on the detection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) have resulted in uncertainty on the prognostic value of circulating melanoma cells.
Experimental Design:
We developed real-time RT-PCR assays for quantitation of tyrosinase, MelanA/MART1, and gp100 and for porphobilinogen deaminase housekeeping gene. Melanoma tissue (n = 18), peripheral blood samples from healthy donors (n = 21), and patients with cutaneous (n = 122) and uveal (n = 64) melanoma from our institution were analyzed. For quality control, an additional 251 samples from ongoing multicenter studies were compared with in-house samples.
Results:
Tyrosinase was not detected in healthy donor blood samples. For the two other markers, cutoff values had to be defined to distinct patient samples from controls. Patients with stage IV uveal and cutaneous melanoma expressed all three markers more frequently and at higher levels in peripheral blood as compared with earlier stages. The variation of expression was 4 logs and correlated with tumor load and serum lactate dehydrogenase. In 2 of 3 uveal melanoma patients, detection of circulating tumor cells preceded the development of liver metastases. The diagnostic sensitivity was optimal in blood samples containing >0.1pg/ microl porphobilinogen deaminase (95.7% of in-house samples and 57.4% of multicenter samples).
Conclusions:
Real-time RT-PCR is able to quantitatively define the quality of a sample and provides quantitative data for melanoma markers. Disparities in the results of previous studies may be attributable to undetected differences in sample quality. The prognostic relevance of this assay is currently under evaluation in several prospective randomized trials.
