Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics
Published on: January 9, 2016
Motor outputs from the primate reticular formation to shoulder muscles as revealed by stimulus-triggered averaging
Adam G Davidson1, John A Buford
1Neuroscience Graduate Studies Program, School of Allied Health Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
Abstract:
The motor output of the medial pontomedullary reticular formation (mPMRF) was investigated using stimulus-triggered averaging (StimulusTA) of EMG responses from proximal arm and shoulder muscles in awake, behaving monkeys (M. fascicularis). Muscles studied on the side ipsilateral (i) to stimulation were biceps (iBic), triceps (iTri), anterior deltoid (iADlt), posterior deltoid (iPDlt), and latissimus dorsi (iLat). The upper and middle trapezius were studied on the ipsilateral and contralateral (c) side (iUTr, cUTr, iMTr, cMTr). Of 133 sites tested, 97 (73%) produced a poststimulus effect (PStE) in one or more muscles; on average, 38% of the sampled muscles responded per effective site. For responses that were observed in the arm and shoulder, poststimulus facilitation (PStF) was prevalent for the flexors, iBic (8 responses, 100% PStF) and iADlt (13 responses, 77% PStF), and poststimulus suppression (PStS) was prevalent for the extensors, iTri (22 responses, 96% PStS) and iLat (16 responses, 81% PStS). For trapezius muscles, PStS of upper trapezius (iUTr, 49 responses, 73% PStS) and PStF of middle trapezius (iMTr, 22 responses, 64% PStF) were prevalent ipsilaterally, and PStS of middle trapezius (cMTr, 6 responses, 67% PStS) and PStF of upper trapezius (cUTr, 46 responses, 83% PStS) were prevalent contralaterally. Onset latencies were significantly earlier for PStF (7.0 +/- 2.2 ms) than for PStS (8.6 +/- 2.0 ms). At several sites, extremely strong PStF was evoked in iUTr, even though PStS was most common for this muscle. The anatomical antagonists iBic/iTri were affected reciprocally when both responded. The bilateral muscle pair iUTr/cUTr demonstrated various combinations of effects, but cUTr PStF with iUTr PStS was prevalent. Overall, the results are consistent with data from the cat and show that outputs from the mPMRF can facilitate or suppress activity in muscles involved in reaching; responses that would contribute to flexion of the ipsilateral arm were prevalent.
Insights
The medial pontomedullary reticular formation (mPMRF) influences arm and shoulder muscles, facilitating flexors and suppressing extensors during reaching movements. These findings in monkeys align with previous cat studies, highlighting mPMRF
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Primate Studies
Background:
- The medial pontomedullary reticular formation (mPMRF) is crucial for motor control.
- Understanding mPMRF's output to proximal arm and shoulder muscles is essential for grasping its role in movement generation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the motor output of the mPMRF on proximal arm and shoulder muscles in awake, behaving monkeys.
- To characterize the nature (facilitation or suppression) and timing of muscle responses evoked by mPMRF stimulation.
Main Methods:
- Stimulus-triggered averaging (StimulusTA) of electromyographic (EMG) responses.
- Recording from multiple ipsilateral and contralateral arm and shoulder muscles in Macaca fascicularis.
- Systematic stimulation of 133 sites within the mPMRF.
Main Results:
- A significant poststimulus effect (PStE) was observed in 73% of tested mPMRF sites.
- Poststimulus facilitation (PStF) was prevalent in ipsilateral flexors (biceps, anterior deltoid), while poststimulus suppression (PStS) was prevalent in extensors (triceps, latissimus dorsi).
- Differential effects were observed in trapezius muscles, with ipsilateral upper trapezius showing PStS and middle trapezius showing PStF, and contralateral effects showing the opposite pattern. PStF onset latencies were shorter than PStS.
Conclusions:
- The mPMRF exerts differential control over arm and shoulder muscles, influencing both flexion and extension.
- The observed patterns of facilitation and suppression are consistent with a role in modulating muscle activity during reaching behaviors.
- Findings in primates corroborate previous studies in cats, suggesting conserved mPMRF motor control mechanisms across species.
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Indirect Motor Pathways
The vestibulospinal tract originates in the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem. The vestibular system detects changes in...
Functional Brain Systems: Reticular Formation
Within the reticular formation, there are several distinct nuclei that can be classified into three broad categories. The Raphe nuclei are located along the midline of the brainstem. They are primarily known for their role in synthesizing and releasing serotonin, a neurotransmitter involved in regulating mood, appetite, sleep, and circadian rhythms. The...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Muscle Contraction

