Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Image formation in low-coherence and confocal interference microscopes.

Colin J R Sheppard1, Maitreyee Roy, Manjula D Sharma

  • 1Physical Optics Laboratory, School of Physics, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. colin@nus.edu.sg

Applied Optics
|March 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Origins of Ploem's Filter Cube: A Pandora's Box.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same author

Deep Learning Model to Detect Diabetic Retinopathy in 45° Images Using Ground Truth from Ultra-Widefield Imaging.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

Confocal and multiphoton microscopy: A selective review.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same author

Machine learning-based prediction of diabetic retinopathy from pupillary abnormalities in a South Indian population.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Biophysical Interactions of Silicon Quantum Dots With Human Tears and Dry Eye Drops: A Langmuir Trough Study.

Translational vision science & technology·2026
Same author

Dual-Illumination Fourier Modulation Microscopy: New Techniques for Multimodal Light Imaging.

Microscopy research and technique·2025

Coherence probe microscopy (CPM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) differ in image formation. OCT offers optical sectioning for clearer imaging of thick structures, unlike CPM which lacks this feature and struggles with aberrations.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Optics
  • Microscopy Techniques
  • Optical Imaging

Background:

  • Coherence Probe Microscopy (CPM) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) are interferometric imaging techniques.
  • CPM operates as a conventional interference microscope, while OCT functions as a confocal interference microscope.
  • Both techniques are utilized for subsurface imaging, but differ in their optical sectioning capabilities and aberration handling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare image formation processes in CPM and OCT.
  • To highlight the advantages of OCT over CPM for imaging through thick biological structures.
  • To analyze the distinct behaviors of the interference term in the presence of optical aberrations for both systems.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of image formation principles in CPM and OCT.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of optical sectioning capabilities in thick samples.
  • Assessment of interference term behavior under aberrated conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • OCT provides optical sectioning, preventing background saturation in thick samples, a limitation of CPM.
    • CPM images can be affected by background saturation due to the lack of optical sectioning.
    • Optical aberrations can be compensated in CPM but not effectively in OCT, impacting image quality.

    Conclusions:

    • OCT is superior to CPM for imaging thick specimens due to its inherent optical sectioning capability.
    • The confocal nature of OCT enhances its performance in scattering media compared to conventional CPM.
    • Aberration compensation is a significant differentiator, favoring CPM in specific applications requiring correction, while OCT's confocal gating offers robustness against scattering.