Off-pump versus on-pump reoperative CABG via a left thoracotomy for circumflex coronary artery revascularization

Oz M Shapira1, Vijay Natarajan, Shantesh Kaushik

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. oz.shapira@bmc.org

Insights

Reoperative CABG via left thoracotomy (RCLT) is safe for circumflex artery revascularization. Off-pump beating heart (OPCAB) technique reduces blood use and hospital stay, making it more cost-effective.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Thoracic Surgery

Background:

  • Reoperative CABG via left thoracotomy (RCLT) offers a viable option for high-risk patients needing circumflex coronary artery revascularization.
  • This study evaluates two techniques: on-pump RCLT using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump RCLT (OPCAB) with a beating heart.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump reoperative CABG via left thoracotomy for circumflex artery revascularization.
  • To assess safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of both techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 32 patients undergoing RCLT over 10 years.
  • Comparison of 14 patients (CPB) with 18 patients (OPCAB).
  • 100% follow-up, with a focus on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, or atrial fibrillation rates.
  • OPCAB group showed significantly lower allogeneic blood product use, shorter ICU, and hospital stays (p<0.05).
  • Three-year survival (74%) and reintervention rates (19%) were similar between groups, with predominantly non-cardiac deaths.

Conclusions:

  • RCLT is a safe and effective approach for circumflex revascularization using either CPB or OPCAB.
  • OPCAB technique demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness due to reduced resource utilization.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos