Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Getting to Compliance in Forced Exercise in Rodents: A Critical Standard to Evaluate Exercise Impact in Aging-related Disorders and Disease
Published on: August 22, 2014
The co-regulation of medical discipline: challenging medical peer review
1School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract:
The medical profession has always fiercely defended its right to self-regulation on the basis of peer review. However, in New South Wales, Australia, the profession has willingly surrendered these rights in favour of a disciplinary system known as co-regulation or collaborative regulation, under which disciplinary processes are shared with a "lay" body, the Health Care Complaints Commission. The system constitutes a unique situation in the history of medical regulation. This article examines the origin and operations of co-regulation and comes to the conclusion that its successful operation over the last decade raises questions about whether peer review is indispensable as the basis of medical regulation.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Drug Regulation
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...