Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Semantics, cross-cultural style.

Edouard Machery1, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Berlin, Germany.

Cognition
|March 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Free will in the eyes of Muslims and Christians.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

How children map causal verbs to different causes across development.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Towards an AI biomedical scientist: Accelerating discoveries in neurodegenerative disease.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

Working across religions, cultures, settings, and development: Protocol for wave 2 data collection with children and parents by the developing belief network.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends or crowds in independent and interdependent societies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Philosophical theories of reference often rely on intuitions. This study found that Westerners and East Asians have different semantic intuitions, challenging universal theories of reference.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Language
  • Cultural Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Theories of reference, particularly descriptivist and causal-historical views, dominate analytic philosophy.
  • Philosophical theories often assess reference using hypothetical intuitions.
  • Cultural psychology reveals cognitive differences between Westerners and East Asians, potentially impacting philosophical intuitions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cultural variations in semantic intuitions regarding theories of reference.
  • To explore if cognitive differences between East Asians and Westerners extend to philosophical intuitions.
  • To examine the implications of cultural variation in intuitions for the philosophy of reference.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment was designed to compare semantic intuitions between Westerners and East Asians.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios to elicit intuitions about term reference.
  • Statistical analysis was used to identify significant differences in reported intuitions.

    • Main Results:

    • Westerners were more likely than East Asians to report intuitions aligning with the causal-historical view of reference.
    • Significant cultural differences were observed in intuitions for specific, central cases of reference.
    • The findings suggest that semantic intuitions are not culturally universal.

    Conclusions:

    • Semantic intuitions, crucial for developing theories of reference, appear to vary across cultures.
    • The study provides prima facie evidence for cultural differences in philosophical intuitions.
    • This cultural variation raises significant questions about the methodology and universality of philosophical inquiry into reference.