Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adjusting to changes in health: implications for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Rajiv Sharma1, Miron Stano, Mitchell Haas

  • 1Department of Economics, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA.

Journal of Health Economics
|March 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Case of Primary Renal Ewing Sarcoma With Metastatic Presentation and Review of Multimodal Management.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Recent advancements in microtubule targeting agents for breast cancer: design strategies and pharmacological insights.

Molecular diversity·2026
Same author

Recent Advances in Benzoxazole Derivatives: Pharmacological Potential and Therapeutic Applications.

Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Left Internal Mammary Artery Injury After Pacemaker Lead Implant-Case Report and Review of Literature.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same author

Expectations and realities in primary care appointment access in the United States: A national study.

Preventive medicine·2026
Same author

Association mapping of wheat distinctness, uniformity, and stability traits identifies evidence of <i>TaDof-B</i> copy number variation associated with stem pith thickness.

Frontiers in plant science·2026
Same journal

Competition matters: Uniform vs. indication-based pricing of pharmaceuticals.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Integrating equity and productivity in health evaluation.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Income and immunity: The consequences of social security administration reform for childhood infection risk.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

When fewer children mean shorter lives: Fertility policy and elderly well-being in China.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Health dynamics and reporting bias at retirement: An analysis using high-frequency data.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Intertemporal coordination in volunteer markets.

Journal of health economics·2026
See all related articles

Patients face adjustment costs when adapting to health changes, making health improvements less valued than deteriorations. This asymmetry impacts cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and intervention rankings.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Analysis
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) traditionally assumes symmetrical valuation of health changes.
  • Patient adaptation to health changes involves psychological and behavioral adjustments.
  • Understanding patient preferences is crucial for accurate health policy decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a model incorporating adjustment costs into health state valuation.
  • To examine the implications of adjustment costs for CEA and intervention rankings.
  • To explore the impact of adjustment costs on multi-dimensional health state rankings.

Main Methods:

  • Economic modeling of patient adjustment costs.
  • Theoretical analysis of health state preferences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulation of cost-effectiveness analysis under different assumptions.

    • Main Results:

    • Adjustment costs lead to asymmetrical patient preferences, valuing improvements less than deteriorations.
    • The inclusion of adjustment costs imposes a more stringent CEA criterion.
    • Adjustment costs can alter the relative rankings of healthcare interventions.
    • Multi-dimensional health states with adjustment costs may prevent consensus on rankings.

    Conclusions:

    • Patient adjustment costs necessitate asymmetrical treatment of health improvements and deteriorations in CEA.
    • Adjustment costs introduce complexities in evaluating healthcare interventions and ranking health states.
    • Further research is needed to incorporate these costs into practical health economic evaluations.