Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning with computerized guidelines in general practice?: A randomized controlled trial.

M Butzlaff1, H C Vollmar, B Floer

  • 1Medical Knowledge Network evidence.de and Grönemeyer Institute of Microtherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany.

Family Practice
|March 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Air pollution accountability research: Moving from a chain to a web.

Global epidemiology·2023
Same author

How do parents perceive their children's epileptic seizures? Experiences of the first seizure and changes during the course of the epilepsy.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B·2023
Same author

Early clinical trial unit tumor board: a real-world experience in a national cancer network.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2023
Same author

The PERCIVAL detector: first user experiments.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2023
Same author

Erratum: Azimuthal Anisotropy of K_{S}^{0} and Λ+Λ[over ¯] Production at Midrapidity from Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s]_{NN}=130  GeV [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 132301 (2002)].

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Erratum: Azimuthal Anisotropy at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider: The First and Fourth Harmonics [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 062301 (2004)].

Physical review letters·2021
Same journal

Universal-offer HIV testing amongst patients undergoing blood tests in primary care: results from a multi-centre study.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Sustainable healthcare knowledge, experience and curricular perspectives: a cross-sectional survey within the European Young Family Doctors Movement network.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

General practice care models and satisfaction in Australian residential aged care homes: a national survey of GPs, practice nurses, and managers.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Effect of direct access to physiotherapy on prescribing and imaging in primary care for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Virtual and in-person interpretation: a qualitative study from the perspective of professional medical interpreters.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Temporal changes in chronic disease management in primary care in relation to telehealth policy changes: Australian whole-of-population interrupted time-series analysis.

Family practice·2026
See all related articles

Computerized clinical guidelines did not significantly increase general practitioners' (GPs) knowledge. Lack of time and easy access are key barriers to guideline implementation in daily medical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Continuing Medical Education
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Evidence-based guidelines are crucial for transferring scientific knowledge into clinical practice and maintaining high care standards.
  • Despite widespread availability, clinical guidelines have limited impact on individual professional learning and daily practice changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess knowledge increase among German general practitioners (GPs) after implementing web- and evidence-based guidelines.
  • To identify and analyze barriers to individual professional learning with computerized guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 72 GPs.
  • Intervention group accessed guidelines via Internet/CD-ROM; control group did not.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Knowledge assessed using multiple-choice questions; reasons for guideline use/non-use analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant knowledge increase was observed in the intervention group (P = 0.69).
    • 58% of GPs in the intervention group used the guidelines, primarily out of curiosity or for specific medical questions.
    • Lack of time was the main reason (78%) for non-use among GPs.

    Conclusions:

    • Computerized guidelines did not efficiently transfer knowledge to GPs.
    • Guideline usage, individual learning, and implementation are dependent on incentives and practical factors like easy and quick access.