Eating disorder diagnostic scale: additional evidence of reliability and validity
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Eric Stice1, Melissa Fisher, Erin Martinez
1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. estice@ori.org
Abstract:
The authors conducted 4 studies investigating the reliability and validity of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (HDDS; E. Stice, C. F. Telch, & S. L. Rizvi, 2000), a brief self-report measure for diagnosing anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. Study 1 found that the HDDS showed criterion validity with interview-based diagnoses, convergent validity with risk factors for eating pathology, and internal consistency. Studies 2 and 3 found that the EDDS was sufficiently sensitive to detect the effects of eating disorder prevention programs. Regarding predictive validity, Studies 3 and 4 found that the EDDS predicted response to a prevention program and future onset of eating pathology and depression. Results provide additional evidence of the reliability and validity of this scale and suggest it may be useful in clinical and research applications.
Related Concept Videos
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Binge Eating Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Bulimia Nervosa
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...